The organization shall formulate a risk treatment plan and produce a statement of applicability that considers the controls in the Annex A of the standard. Corrective actions usually include the review of the risk assessment approach and a review of relevant risks.Ħ.1.3 Information security risk treatment a lack of scales for assigning values to likelihood and consequences of risks the second is that not all relevant risks are identified (usually organizations focus on IT risks and risks from external origins). A total of 27% of organizations do not meet the requirements, usually for 2 reasons: the first is that the approach does not ensure the consistency and the validity of results, e.g. This shall include the establishment of an approach for the information security risk management, information security risk acceptance criteria, the identification, the analysis and the evaluation of risks. The organization shall define and apply an information security risk assessment process. The following issues are specifically relevant to companies certified ISO/IEC 27001:Ħ.1.2 Information security risk assessment Almost the 40% of the companies had findings related to section A.12, where we find IT system management and, partially, IT network requirements.įor the top-three most frequent severe failures (excluding 9.2 and 9.3 that are common to all management systems, and hence less relevant here), an in-depth qualitative analysis has been conducted aimed at categorizing the root-causes behind the non-conformities and the corrective actions put in place by companies to manage the issue and preventing it from recurring. with a major non-conformity (Cat1) or a minor non-conformity (Cat2). Non-severe findings include observations and opportunities for improvement.Ī total of 78% of companies audited to ISO/IEC 27001 experienced at least one finding (any category) whilst 40% concluded the audit with at least one severe finding, i.e. Severe findings include major and minor non-conformities. For the purpose of this analysis, a distinction is made between “severe” and “non-severe” findings. The statistics are based on audit findings. Top 10 most frequent severe (non-conformity) failures per sub-process Supply Chain & Product Assurance (English).Karrierer Overview (English) Job opportunities (English) Career development (English) Why DNV? (English) Diversity & inclusion (English) Om vores hovedsektorer Maritime (English) Energy Systems (English) Business Assurance Supply Chain & Product Assurance (English) Digital Solutions (English) Veracity data platform (English) Sector insights Maritime (English) Power and renewables (English) Oil and gas (English)ĭNV Group About us (English) Research & technology (English) Sustainability (English) Annual reports (English) Insights - Insights from auditing information security management systems Other sectors Sektorer Indsigt Om os Sign in Sign in to Veracity Open menu Open search
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |